Welch’s Grape Juice, Worldly Wisdom, and Wine
August 3, 2006 by fundyreformed
With wine on the mind, I thought I would discuss the interesting role of Thomas B. Welch in the controversy concerning the use of alcohol.
Thomas Welch is remembered as the inventor of modern grape juice. He applied Louis Pasteur’s new pasteurization process to grapes: the result was unfermented wine better known as grape juice. But what many do not know is that Welch had a specific reason for experimenting with grape juice. He was a minister who objected to alcoholic wine being used for communion. So much so, in fact that he refused to touch it even though he had been elected communion steward. After developing his unfermented communion alternative, he tried, unsuccessfully to substitute it in his church’s communion. Eventually, however, he convinced his church and many others to use the unfermented wine, furthering his temperance movement cause. The family business soon grew and his son Charles E. Welch developed the business into the large company it is today.
So there you have it. A centuries long practice of using alcoholic wine in communion is overturned by a prohibitionist and profiteer. To substantiate my history claims above look no further than Welch’s own company history. At the bottom of this article there are further resources.
Now I do not want this article to say too much. I definitely want to be fair and honest in my presentation of the facts. For instance, it appears that Welch was moved more by conviction than capitalism (at least initially). And also the fact that Welch invented the modern method of preserving grape juice does not imply that there were no other methods prior to 1869. For instance the link provided here gives some documentation of ancient methods of preserving grape juice which may have been used in Bible times and after. I am not advocating that every instance of the word wine in the Bible must only be understood as alcoholic wine. However, in my research I believe there are numerous places where the Bible affirms the intoxicating nature of wine (thus fermented wine) as a gift of God, see my first post on the topic here.
The link provided above goes on to cite evidence that unfermented wine was the normal practice of the early church. While I have not looked into all that evidence closely, I do believe there is plenty of evidence to the contrary. For instance Keith Mathison claims that fermented wine was the universal custom of the church for 1800 years, see this link to a pertinent excerpt from his book Given for You: Reclaiming Calvin’s Doctrine of the Lord’s Supper. History unequivocally testifies that from 1500 until the late 1800s it was universal practice among Catholic, Protestant, and Anabaptist groups to use alcoholic wine in communion and daily life. It should be startling, therefore, to learn that the prohibition movement and a particular representative of it, Thomas Welch, were extremely instrumental in changing that consensus into the great controversy of the present. Today, many churches and even entire denominations decry any use of alcohol and act as if this has always been the position of God’s church.
Before I close, let me briefly discuss the prohibition movement. The movement was spawned from a worldly wisdom not a Christian belief system: the church joined the bandwagon of the secular movement, not vice versa. This claim is easily substantiated through basic research. I encourage you to peruse this article to gain an understanding of the previous widespread consumption in America and the birth of Prohibition. The article goes on to document the underhanded tactics used by the prohibitionists. They censored school textbooks and paraded pure fallacies as documented fact. Also of note is prohibition’s view that alcohol was bad and that which inherently caused drunkenness and alcoholism. They saw many of the problems of society traced to the disease of alcoholism with alcohol as the culprit. In this focus the movement practically denied the Biblical contention that what is inside a man defiles him, not what comes into him. They thought society could be cured of its evils by purging it of alcohol, but society is only cured through its submission to the Lordship of Christ.
When anyone wants to develop a position on alcohol and hopes to prove whether or not Scripture permits its use they must not ignore the facts presented here. Failing to admit that the practice and doctrine of churches were influenced by the secular temperance movement will not permit the investigator to understand that he may be severely prejudiced through his own church traditions of the past one hundred or more years. In this discussion, therefore, it is vital to remember the role Thomas Welch and the worldly wise temperance movement made in the history of the church and its views concerning wine.
Resources and Documentation:
Welch’s Grape Juice
- Wikipedia article on Thomas Welch
- Wikipedia article on Grape Juice
- United Methodist Church History documenting Welch’s influence on changing to using grape juice for communion
- Christianity Today brief mention of Welch and his influence
- Brief article by American Vision entitled “Turning Wine into Grape Juice”
- Detailed Obituary of Thomas Welch and his efforts to introduce Grape Juice into Churches for communion use
Prohibition
- Detailed article on the history of Prohibition in the US — notes the widespread use of alcohol prior to the beginning of prohibition
- Article detailing views of drunkenness prior, during, and after the prohibition — showcases Puritan preachers views of drunkenness and also shows how prohibition blamed alcohol as the cause of alcoholism
- Wikipedia article on the American Temperance Movement
picture borrowed from here
∼striving for the unity of the faith for the glory of God∼ Eph. 4:3,13 • Rom. 15:5-7













I’m really grateful for your contribution to this topic. It really fleshes out the temperance movement aspect of modern evangelicalism’s disobedience regarding the Lord’s Supper.
With your permission, I’ll be posting a note about these posts at my site and linking readers over here to learn the rest of the story.
No problem, John. Go right ahead.
Hey, thanks for your posts too. They have been a blessing, particularly the answering objections post. I’m looking forward to the last installments.
Have a Blessed Day.
Bob,
I thoroughly enjoyed your post. You are correct in asserting that the Scriptures do put alcoholic drinks in a positive light. One thing I would mention is that the alcohol that was used on most occasions then was heavily diluted with water, so that it was nearly impossible to becom intoxicated. “Strong drink” in the Scriptures refers to beverages which were not diluted (still, even those usually had the alcohol level of today’s beer). The early Church would have used the diluted wine.
This is not to dispute your greater point, which is, as you said, distorted and hidden by the Prohibitionists, but to refine it.
Sincerely,
The Stone Waterspout
Gargoyle,
I’ve never spoken to a stone statue before…
On a more serious note, thanks for the comment. I am sure you are aware that there is debate over what percentage of alcohol wine in Bible times had. Some say that in NT times the drink was not diluted. Most say the alcohol content was somewhere between 3% and 11%. Beer today has around 5% and wine typically has anywhere from 9% to 14%.
Also, Scripture makes clear that drunkenness was a common problem in both OT and NT days, and so your statement “it was nearly impossible to become intoxicated” is not entirely accurate. Even though it was a problem, as evidenced in 1 Cor. 11, the solution was not to ban the beverage, but to ban the behavior of drunkenness and riotous living. Scripture commends the wine but condemns the drunkard. Why can’t we follow that clear lead?
Again, thanks for dropping by. But don’t turn into anything really spooky now, okay?
I think this is an interesting issue. I’ve always meant to study it. I think using grape juice in communion is silly but I had assumed there was some biblical basis for it but if there isn’t I can’t imagine why anyone does it. No drunkenness can be a problem - it was a problem in my family and so I’ve chosen not to drink. Many of my Christian brothers have taken this as meaning I’m somehow not as manly as they are, that I’ve taken up the women prohibitionist’s mantle and have forsaken my God-given option to chose something that women are afraid of. For me I do sometimes drink a little but I really think it tastes like garbage, costs a lot, and has been the cause of a lot of problems in our socity so I don’t do it and it has nothing to do with me being afraid - everyone in my family drank - my mom drinks as much as anyone. But communion wine couldn’t hurt anyone - especially not in those nifty tiny-tiny little cups.
Thanks for the comments Clint. I am totally fine with someone choosing not to drink. But forbiding it or insinuating that everyone who does so is sinning, is wrong.
About the tiny little cups, check out this post where I advocate returning to a celebration of the Lord’s Supper that more closely matches what we see modelled in Scripture and the early church.
God bless you richly in Christ Jesus,
Bob Hayton
Bob,one N.T.Miracle that is overlooked is how those believers in 1.Cor.11:22 got drunk off of Grape Juice.When I was a student at Tenn.Temple(69-71) I learned that Noah did not know the grape juice he drank was fermented when he got drunk(after being intelligent enough to build an ark).The argument for total abstinance from the Bible is an exercise in ridiculous absurdity.I drink a little home-made scuppernong wine just so no one will accuse me of being a fundamentalist.
Bill Poore
Bill,
I agree that the 1 Cor. 11 argument is one of the strongest! I deal with that somewhat in my initial post on the subject.
God bless,
Bob
[...] Welch’s Grape Juice, Worldly Wisdom, and Wine [...]